Municipal investment tool
Estimate the economic return of a public skatepark, pump track, or combined wheel park. Built for advocates presenting to city councils, parks departments, and planning committees. Toggle pillars on or off to match the case you're making.
Facility type
Facility scale
Construction cost
Daily users P2 input
Drives visitor spending (P2) only — not used in P1
Operating days / year
Direct user economic surplus
Consumer willingness-to-pay value
Visitor & tourism spending
Out-of-town visitor economic impact
Combined annual value
per year · community economic value, not municipal revenue
Value recovery
—
Annual return
—
Methodology notes
High confidence — peer-reviewed
P1 = construction cost × annual surplus rate. Kemp (2025) Lauridsen baseline: $488K/yr from $6.2M = 7.9%/yr. Rates here (3–7.2%) are scaled down for smaller facilities: neighborhood parks serve mostly local users whose near-zero travel costs generate minimal TCM-measured surplus. Destination facilities approach the Lauridsen ratio. P1 is independent of daily user count.
Medium confidence — proxy data
P2 = daily users × visitor fraction (1.5–4%, ascending by scale) × operating days × proxy daily spend × 1.72× multiplier (OIA, 2022). Operating days are adjustable to reflect local climate: 340+ days for mild climates (GA, TX, FL), ~300 for temperate (CO, PA, NC), ~265 for northern (MN, WI, NY), ~220 for harsh winters (ND, MT, AK). Spending benchmarks from mountain bike tourism research — no equivalent dataset exists for wheeled sport parks. Income adjustment: MTB participant households skew above $75K median income vs. ~$54K for skateboarding (NSGA survey data); pump track visitor spend estimates are set higher to reflect the MTB-family demographic, while skatepark estimates are reduced accordingly. Wheel park figures split the difference.